Kodak SCANZA Digital Film Scanner, Converts 35mm, 126, 110

Kodak SCANZA Digital Film Scanner

Kodak SCANZA Digital Film Scanner, Converts 35mm, 126, 110, Super 8 and 8mm Film Negatives and Slides To JPEG Includes Large Tilt Up 3.5 LCD and EasyLoad Film Inserts


film scanneraakf

Please note the scanner scan only scan film that has previously been developed, it CANNOT develop or scan raw film.

Features:

  • Large 3.5” LCD Screen: helps you operate the scanner, view slideshows and edit images with handy tilt and adjustable brightness features
  • 14 Megapixel Sensor: captures images in stunning HD clarity
  • Integrated Interpolation: optional setting enhances images up to 22 megapixels
  • 3 Numbered Slide Inserts: easily adapt to your old films for safe, convenient loading
  • 3 Numbered Adapter Trays: hold the inserts and click into the unit for speedy scanning
  • Power On/Off: turns the unit on and off
  • Home Button: lets you navigate back to the interface’s main page
  • Capture Button: saves the current image or returns to the capture view screen
  • USB Cable: connect to a computer, laptop or other device for image upload
  • AC Adapter: Includes UK US and EU adapters



Weight: 1 Pounds
Dimensions: 12 x 12 x 12.7 centimetres
Brand: KODAK
Model: RODFS35
Part: RODFS35
Colour: Black
Batteries Included: 1 Unknown batteries required.
Dimensions: 12 x 12 x 12.7 centimetres

39 Responses

  1. EulaIngram says:

     United Kingdom

    Very versatile for copying major sizes of negatives and colour transparencies, very easy to use. Unbeatable value for money

  2. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Works as described, a little fiddly but a reasonable price.

  3. Matthew S. Smith says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 17 From Our UsersSo, I thought I could perhaps digitise a couple of hundred or so 50 year old slides and 35mm film-before they fade away.
    Thus a Kodak Scanza looked a sensible choice for specification and costs. I am impressed, results exceeded expectations. Now, instead of multi boxes of slides/film my memories reside on 12mm by 15mm micro sim card. But I have kept the slides etc, and projector, one never knows and after all ,they are also memories.
    On the plus side, I can bore family and friends so much easier now. Photos Aden, RAF Khormaksar 1964/5

    One of my "best buys"

  4. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Product very easy to use, worked without any issues with PC. Display could be better but adequate for the required task.

  5. David Priest says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 4 From Our UsersOnce I had worked out how to use it the scanner was very good. My problem is that I can’t read the instructions the printing is too small even using a magnifying glass, I had to enlarge it on the printer, it was a struggle.

  6. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 5 From Our UsersSome older Agfa slides are too thick to fit in the 35mm carrier, but you can still scan without the carrier. (jus a bit slower!).

  7. Mark Sinclair says:

     United Kingdom 🇬🇧

    Golden Review Award: 2 From Our UsersHelped me preserve my family memories from negatives that date back to the 1950s. Works best with 35mm negatives but the mounts for the smaller negatives are tricky to use (I had to snip the corner off the negative strips so that they would slide through the mounts more easily)..
    Colour adjustment is quite basic but adequate as you can fine tune using a photo editor like Photoshop.

  8. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom 🇬🇧

    Nothing to complain about.
    Satisfied with results from late 69’s b/w negatives and early 70’s slides

  9. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom 🇬🇧

    This digital scanner is quick to use, has both brightness and colour correction to assist with aging negatives. The instruction booklet takes you through, what seems a complicated set process, but once mastered is reasonably easy to use. My only regret is the digital copy is not quite razor sharp although fairly good.

  10. Mayra says:

     United Kingdom 🇬🇧

    Does what it says on the tin for 35mm slides. If you have some older slides with the glass inserts (thicker) then it is not easy to get them into the scanner. I ‘modified’ one of the trays to accommodate this. In terms of colour & crop, I am not really concerned as I import to Lightroom for a final polish. If you didn’t have some post processing, then the limitations of this level of device become apparent. In summary, a decent scanner *if* you have some post processing software

  11. MilanClayqnje says:

     United Kingdom

    If this scanner would take transparencies in thicker plastic mounts I would be giving it five stars but unfortunately I have only been able scan half of my transparencies as the other half are in plastic mounts.

  12. ChadwicWhitacre says:

     United Kingdom

    If you have a lot of old 35mm slides and negatives to put into a computer, this is a great gadget to have. 110mm negatives are a bit tricky to feed through so be prepared to be patient but the results are good. I’ve put through 900 slides and just over 1000 negatives. Would recommend for sure

  13. Annies Granny says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 2 From Our UsersI normally use a Nikon macro lens to photograph my slides (I have thousands) but was getting concerned about the lack of real progress and, in any event, photographing negatives is another ball game altogether. I thought I’d take a chance on this gizmo and was pleasantly surprised. A lot of our photos are run-of-the-mill (just a record) and the pictures produced by the Scanza were perfectly acceptable. I still have the option, if I want, to photograph with my Nikon macro lens any odd photos that need top notch quality. I’ve dropped it one star because it seems to have an automatic exposure adjustment which is good within a small tolerance, however, if a photo is under/over exposed by a stop or two then the picture ends of up washed out. It is possible to go back and manually adjust the exposure but that is best done for a batch of pictures. I’d like it so that I can adjust in the viewfinder before I actually perform the scan.

  14. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 4 From Our UsersCopied a range of different slide sizes. I had some that were in 2mm thick plastic surrounds with a 40mm x 40mm viewing area and these were the only ones that posed a problem. It required opening the frame and putting the film in the guide then working out how to obtain the best area of the slide by playing with the various formats. With all slides you have to make sure you view them from the correct side. Most of them had it marked but some required working from memory or looking at the background.

    The instruction manual is clear and comprehensive.

    It is not something with which you can realistically copy 8mm cine. You have to feed the film through a guide and for some reason my film wouldn’t line up properly. It is then a case of capturing each frame and cine takes at 24 fps so one minute would be 1440 frames. I did try a selection but stopped after about 80 frames, just over 3 seconds. It is then a case of using a video editing app to stich the frames together. It did work but considering the time it would take I don’t think practical.

    Otherwise a good piece of kit.

  15. WilmerHarper says:

     United Kingdom

    It took me a little bit of “trial and error” to initially set up as I didn’t find the enclosed user manual to be very clear on this (that may just be me and it wasn’t too difficult really!). Otherwise the device is very easy to handle and to use; the adapter (feeder tray) for slides looks a bit fragile but seems to work well. I have begun scanning my many old colour slides onto a SanDisk memory card and then via this to my computer and I am extremely pleased with the results. I would recommend this product.

  16. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    I spent a long time researching slide scanners and I’m really pleased I chose this one. For the purposes of being able to view slides and share with others it is really great. It may not be the best quality in terms of resolution but that is not a problem for me. It has enabled me to look at slides I inherited from grandparents which haven’t been viewed for 30 years. It’s very simple to use once set up – just be aware that you need to treat the sd card carefully and make sure you eject it safely from your computer otherwise it can get corrupted.

  17. JaneChippindall says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 7 From Our UsersIts okay, it works and its constructed well. The design is nice the screen is an okay size better than many and it pivots which is a great idea so you can view square on. Packaged well, instruction okay. However it could be greatly improved if the designers had given a little more consideration. You have to save to a card and then upload which is silly. I have it linked to my desktop to provide power but I can’t save to it directly, my last two did. Even more irritating, as other people have stated, each time you load up your card to the storage space it starts again a No 1. So if you want to store photos in one file you will have to renumber each one. And if you records are not perfect like mine and you want to move photos between folders beware of overwriting.
    The software can be a little glitchy, I had a few batches when the colour did not match, ran them again and they were okay. But it works and I was able to process thousands on negs and slides. It does not accept older slides with a square format (if anyone still has any) it does not have a holder for really thick slides. However I was able to rest these on top of a holder and carefully slide them in!

  18. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Chunky feel, pleasant to use if a bit slower than expected. This is due to having to insert each slide into holder. Expect this is same with similar devices though.
    Copied 35mm slides well for PC. Not tried any adjustments on device would rather tweek on pc, so copy originals.
    Screen clear, would like to have been larger but this device was best compromise I found.
    Viewing on TV ok but spoilt by seeing bottom information over a small amount of picture. Will see if there is a was around this in the menus.
    Overall pleased with device.

  19. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Took several minutes to understand the instructions (older people who don’t understand tech talk). Once instructions understood very easy to use and a good job to undertake in lockdown and has also given us a wonderful walk down memory Lane and many laughs. Some slides over 50 years old so don’t expect them to come out top quality, as they probably weren’t top quality in the first place

  20. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    This is very easy to use for 35mm negatives and you can just feed the negative strips through.

    Unfortunately, I have found every 110 negative strip I have was cut shorter than the negative holder and you have to position each picture manually.

    126 negatives are worse as it doesn’t have a true negative holder at all, you use one of the slide holders and have to ensure they don’t move about too much.

  21. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Since writing my last review I have finally got it to work after purchasing a new memory card. It appears to be working although I am finding the manual difficult to understand.

  22. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    An excellent piece of kit which I’ve used to scan 126 colour slides, 126 negatives and 135 negatives. It’s easy to use, the screen is large and clear and uploading images to a laptop is simple to do. There may be cheaper equipment available, but This is the only kit that I’ve used, so I can’t compare with others on performance or price. I can say though that I think the Kodak scanner is reasonably priced and performs excellently. I would definitely buy it again.

  23. LavonneKirkcald says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 10 From Our UsersThis is mid-range Kodak scanner, but it produces good quality, high resolution images from old style 35mm slides. The purpose of this type of scanner is to convert 35mm analogue slides into digital files for easier viewing. I had found a large pile of slides originally taken by my late father, and this was objective for this scanner. This was a daunting batch, but needed to be converted just to view the images on modern equipment. This scanner has proved ideal for this task. It is easy to use, and scans into digital files within a few seconds. The lengthy part of the cycle time is loading individual slides, which need to be accurately mounted in a sliding frame. Like similar tasks the loading becomes easier with experience, but accuracy is important to avoid scanning the edges of the frames. There is also a range of frames to cover differing types of film size. The range is fully explained in the product descriptions, but I have only used the 35mm slide frame. The slide frame for 35mm is hinged, and clamps hold on each slide to hold the frame, and ensure it falls within the fixed focal length, so that each image accurately reflects the quality of the original slide. Don’t expect it to work miracles if the original slide is out of focus or blurred by movement. However, there is a limited range of editing on the scanner, so some exposure errors can be corrected before the image is scanned. In my experience most modern software offers a wider range of editing for the image once secured to your laptop, etc.
    The scanner must have an SD memory card inserted, because all the scanned images are saved to the memory card. This means that you can transfer the SD card and the new files to your preferred location for saving. I have not found a method as yet to link to the computer to transfer the files without moving the SD card, but I expect that this is feasible, I have only to extend my practice.
    Overall I feel confident to recommend this kit, and I have been pleased with the results, which have secured my late father’s photography for future generations.

  24. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Simple to use. Facebook videos more helpful than instruction book to find out how it works.
    Works well for slides with a thick, plastic frame.
    However, the carrier for cardboard mounted slides is of poor quality and frequently jams.
    Easy to transfer downloaded photos to a compute

  25. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom 🇬🇧

    The product was thrown into our front porch on Monday, not handed to me. There was no Amazon packaging to disguise it. The 64Gb microsdxc card arrived 2 days later from a different source but no adapter. Luckily I was able to access an adapter so eventually after a thorough read of the manual got it working on Friday. Some parts are delicate. I have at least 2000 35mm slides to digitise and it is much quicker than using a full size scanner but the built in editing features are limited. I used Gimp on my PC to do some extra adjustments. The screen is clear and adequate for the copying. The controls are simple and easy to use.
    It needs to be mentioned that a card adapter is needed.

  26. Louise Carey says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 7 From Our UsersHaving seen mixed reviews on this i was a little apprehensive about buying it to archive my parents negatives. I am sure there are possibly better more expensive scanners out there but this is fast and easy to use and let’s be honest my parents were not professional photographers.
    Funny thing is though that this is pretty good. Its true that rubbish in rubbish out and there were a lot of poor negatives and slides and this will not correct under exposed negatives or replace missed tops of heads or feet. However, with a decent negative it produces a decent scan. I say scan but I believe it takes a photo of the negative rather than a scan hence the speed.
    You have to save to sd card as it will not scan direct to a computer. Therefore you need to do post scanning corrections with computer software which may not be as good as changing the settings for a scan. However for the majority of the photos I dealt with it was quite good enough without any adjustment. We are after all talking about 50 ish year old negatives. Yes they may have marks that would need removing if you wanted to display the photos but for a digital archive this is very good.
    Most of my negatives are 35mm but some older ones are larger and do not fit which is a great shame as they are my grandparents and parents early years.

  27. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Very impressed, does not take long to scan. Have tried using a normal photo scanner, with negative & slide attachments but took a while to do them. Take it from one, who has lots to do, would not be without it. Once received I did watch a you tube video, to make sure I was using it correctly.

  28. Anna Diary of an Eccentric says:

     United Kingdom

    Very easy to transfer slides to digital. Did 400 in a few hours. If you transfer dust onto the light screen the cleaning tool is not brilliant. The built-in screen is not great for checking picture quality but you can use the hdmi output to view on a monitor, pity mine is an old vga monito

  29. ClaribeNewquist says:

     United Kingdom

    This is the 4th scanner I have purchased, the others faulting after a short period or being unsuitable. The Skanza scanner carriage was unable to accept some of my slides from 40+ years ago and a home made one had to be made.
    2000+ slides scanned and placed on my PC. It is easy to use, brightness and colour can be changed and the results are satisfactory.

  30. JohannaRobichau says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 54 From Our UsersThe Kodak Scanza is a great little film scanner. Years ago I had scanned my best 35mm slides using a Canon CanoScan FS4000US but this would take several minutes per slide. Sadly the CanoScan FS4000US became unusable with Windows and computer upgrades. In any case scanning 2000 slides was not going to be feasible using the CanoScan FS4000US because of the time required. The Scanza is much faster — only a few seconds per slide. Images captured by the Scanza are not as good as that made by the CanoScan FS4000US but they are definitely good enough for display on a HD (1920 x 1080 dpi) monitor.

    The Scanza is not actually a scanner. It appears to capture images using a digital camera within the unit. This makes it very fast to capture a file. The created files have properties of:
    Camera model FSII-20MC
    F-stop f/2.8
    Exposure time ranging from 1/15 second to 1/2 second depending on the brightness selected
    ISO-100.

    There is no need to use the mains adaptor. The Scanza can be powered from a computer via a USB cable. It is then convenient to download files from the Scanza (previously saved on a SD memory card) to the PC.

    Along with the advertised film adaptors, the Scanza package includes two adaptors for 35mm slides: one for 1.9 mm to 3.0 mm thick slides and another for thinner slides.

    The Scanza creates 2880 dpi x 4320 dpi images from 35mm slides (2880 x 4320 = 12,441,600 pixels or about 12.4 megapixels). The 22 megapixel setting (4.6 Mbyte file size after compression to a jpg) is no better than the 14 megapixel (1.6Mbyte file size). But my experience indicates that a 1600 dpi scan would be more than adequate so at 2880 dpi the Scanza is just fine. At 1600 dpi the grain on film can be seen.

    The first two images were scanned at 1600 dpi with Canon CanoScan FS4000US film scanner from a Kodak EBX ISO 100 film slide. Images three and four were made with the Scanza at 14 and 22 megapixel respectively. Images 2, 3 and 4 are closeups so that the quality can be seen.

    Finally, take off the protective cellophane from the feet. This makes the Scanza very stable to operate.

    Fast Scanner Good for Capturing Many Images

  31. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom 🇬🇧

    Golden Review Award: 2 From Our UsersEasy enough to setup and operate once you get used to the ‘on-screen’ prompts and button presses. Viewing the negatives or scans on the screen is fine, reasonable detail. However the resulting ‘photos’ you get are a little lacking in precise detail. I had an older much cheaper type of negative scanner that produced better detail. If you work on these scanned images with something like Photoshop you can easily see the slightly muddled pixels. Printing out the images on an inkjet printer actually produces results that look better then expected, probably as the inks merge together a bit masking the problem. Having to swap over the various holders and change the film types in the settings can be a bit of a nuisance, and pushing the negatives into the holder can sometimes stick as there are spaces inside the holders where the corners of the negatives can catch.

  32. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Quite pricey but the quality of the slide images when digitalised was very good. Easy to use and glad I invested a bit more as I think it is just about worth it.

  33. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom 🇬🇧

    Golden Review Award: 7 From Our UsersHaving used one of the rival scanning units and getting poor results I decided to up the ante and try this Kodak branded model. From having now used it for over two months and scanned around 4000 images, I have found this scanner to be versatile Ann producing good quality results, from media dating back to the early 1960s (B&W negatives).

    OK, it’s twice the price of some of the better rivals but for the price paid, you get a great deal of versatility. Easy to use great connectivity, multiple formats, 35mm, 126, 110 8 & Super 8 – slides and negatives (no slides in 8/Super 8). Inbuilt menu options, gallery function, cast to TV ( via AV cable), direct export to PC (via USB cable) and more.

    There have been some bad reviews but don’t be put off, this piece of kit works fine.

    Finally, one tip: don’t be in a hurry to pass your media through. This scanner actually takes 1/15 sec and then saves. Moving the media through before the Saved message appears onscreen, can lead to blurred results – even if your original image was sharp! Best to let the scanner complete it’s job properly.

  34. TMXPreston says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 4 From Our UsersThis device is simply excellent at providing virtually instant readable images of colour and monochrome negatives which is very useful in both identifying pictures and capturing them digitally. It also captures colour positive slides to to digital format on the SD card. Colour fidelity and resolution are extremely good for a device at this price point and colour balance and density are adjustable. I have given this device five stars because it does what I want so very well. However, at this price it does have a few minor shortcomings. The film carriers are a bit “plasticy”, the colour balance and density adjustments are in large jumps and getting the SD card images on to a computer is a bit of a fiddle. Nevertheless the quality of the images from the scans when put on a large screen TV are surprisingly good.

  35. Sheila Vilvens says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 2 From Our UsersFor the money, this is a very basic device. You have to manually feed negatives through, frame by frame, and this is quite fiddly and imprecise. Some gloves for handling the negatives is essential. It takes an SD card (not micro SD) to store images; these are dirt cheap these days, so including one would have been nice. Having said all of that, the process is quite quick and the results acceptable. I find that the images are sharp enough to tell whether you have nailed the focus and composition and I suppose if one wanted a high quality print one would use a photo lab. The simplicity and standalone functionality is very appealing given that my previous Epson scanner was rendered useless by a MacOS upgrade!

  36. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 2 From Our UsersDoes the job pretty well but with some failings. Works well with negatives, cardboard slides and thin plastic slides. Old thick slides can not pass through the plastic slide adapters. A work around is to place each of the thick slides in turn at the end of the slide adapter and scan them one at a time. Works but is slow. Generally worth buying if you have lots of old slides and negatives. I am pretty happy with it.

  37. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Product basically as expected, having regard to other reviews, notably the need to reduce the blue lighting and the minor cropping.
    For decent quality slides the reproduction is good.
    Product is easy and quick to use.

  38. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom 🇬🇧

    Golden Review Award: 79 From Our UsersThis is an excellent product, very easy to set up, all it needs is an SD card to store the images to. For 35mm there are two mounts, one for thin or cardboard mounts, the other for thicker plastic mounts such as Agfa used to use. The nature of the device makes it very easy to use as the slides are simply pushed through in succession. A little care is needed to ensure the full frame is central then scan to SD… as easy as that. My task was to scan several hundred 35mm colour slides that my father had taken going back to 1955. Their scanned appearance is very good, particularly given the age of the slides. A little cropping in Photoshop or similar would help to clean up the edges of the scanned image as the mount is just in view in some cases, but that is really nitpicking. What I liked most was the speed I could push the slides through the scanner. I had previous experience of a scanner that needed a magazine of four slides to be mounted and then pushed through the machine, laborious, very time consuming and demotivating. I was astonished how quickly I got through the collection of slides. The only real problem I encountered was with some of the thin slides, both card and plastic mounts, that were slightly bowed and stuck on the way in but I’m sure that was mainly down to their age and is not a criticism of the scanner.

    So I would highly recommend this for anyone who wants to quickly scan slides onto digital media. In my case this has enable me to send a copy on SD card to my brother who is delighted with this nostalgic record. An excellent buy.

  39. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 31 From Our UsersI was one of those people with old family slides that had not been seen in years, finally got round to wanting to sort them out and after contacting company’s to put them on dvd for me I was so disappointed at the price to do this then I found THE KODAC SCANZA
    Wow what a great bit of kit, so easy to use, slides transfer to a memory stick, I then transferred stick on to my computer where I can view large, or print of myself or plug into my smart tv and create slide show, (memory stick not included) so good check it out and do it yourself, you will save loads, if I can work it out anyone ca