The Northman [DVD] [2022]
The Northman [DVD] [2022]




| Dimensions: | 20.9 x 15.2 x 1.7 cm; 180 Grams |
| Dimensions: | 20.9 x 15.2 x 1.7 cm; 180 Grams |
| Origin: | United Kingdom |
The Northman [DVD] [2022]




| Dimensions: | 20.9 x 15.2 x 1.7 cm; 180 Grams |
| Dimensions: | 20.9 x 15.2 x 1.7 cm; 180 Grams |
| Origin: | United Kingdom |
…..dirty and brooding. Well shoot and well acted. I loved it but many didn’t!?
This director also did the The Witch (loved it) and The Lighthouse (hated it), so his stuff is a bit hit or miss.
An unusual and rarely used period for a film presentation, bringing resonance of the more fictional/fantasy
theme seen in “Conan The Barbarian” in its more factual depiction of the story of a ruling Nordic family split by treachery and the subsequent years-long quest by the estranged threatened son for revenge. Told in
a style that mixes myth and more realistic human strengths and weaknesses and allows for plenty of action/
bloodletting along the way. A good believable adult lead plus some famous Hollywood faces from other
films across various genres, with good production values makes this well worth its modest cost on Blu-ray.
This film had good acting and very good cinematography and epic camera shots.
If you enjoy Viking history then you will really enjoy this film for what it is because it was heavily researched in Viking history.
It can be long winded for some people but for me I think it was excellent. The storyline could be more entertaining but then again they were being a bit more historical accurate.
For me the film was good and watchable but the best part was definitely Claes Bang’s performance. I think without him the film would not quite have hit the mark.
Possibly in my top 3 favourite films of all time. Not one for fans of the romanticised image of the Norse – there’s no Noble Savage here, only cruel people loaded with ambition and a host of bizarre rituals. Lauded for its historical accuracy, the film is an amalgamation of several Icelandic sagas into one epic tale of betrayal and revenge. We even go to a place barely touched by modern TV and film – early medieval Russia during the expeditions of the Norse! There’s no black and white characters – Amleth, the main character (Shakespeare’s Hamlet) is betrayed by his uncle and forced into exile, but there’s no pity here, as he is a brutal man living in a brutal age and reminds us of this many times on his way to vengeance. Brilliant acting, surreal scenes of Norse mythology thrown in side-by-side with the reality of the times. Another fantastic film from this director.
Again, this film won’t be for everyone. The image of the heroic and noble ‘Viking warrior’ found on our TVs such as Vikings is barely found here, and as much as those qualities make for great and relatable characters they’re simply not true to the reality of the period. This film truly brings the Viking Age to life and you step away with a changed mindset on the entire culture. 5 star film for history buffs!
American director Robert Houston Eggers is emphatically a ‘Marmite’ director. Aged just 39, with a career in theatre direction and design, he has now directed three films. His second film, 2019’s ‘The Lighthouse’ was fted, exceptionally stylistic and stylized, but not universally acclaimed. Personally, I detested it. My review (10 Nov 2020) summarised it as technically brilliant, but clich-ridden and overblown. I suggested that Eggers tried to manipulate his audience, to shock.
Here, to a degree, Eggers follows the self-same track. But whilst in 2019, he had a budget of $11 million, and a cast of 2, here he had something well north of $70 million and a stellar cast including Nicole Kidman, Alexander Skarsgrd, Bjrk and Ethan Hawke ~ and Willem Defoe again. In 2019, Eggers and his co-writer picked the pocket of Edgar Allan Poe and a very good BBC film from 2016. Here, he and his co-writer mine the Viking legend of Amleth, originally documented by Danish historian Saxo Grammaticus, writing in about 1200, which was the source of Shakespeare’s peerless tragedy ‘Hamlet, Prince of Denmark’.
Apparently, Skarsgrd had wanted to make a Viking film for some years, and discussed collaboration with Eggers. The project got off the ground fast, was filmed on location in both Northern Ireland and the Republic, and in Iceland, and premiered in Stockholm in March 2022.
As with ‘The Lighthouse’, the film is a visual treat. The landscapes (and seascapes) used are fabulously wild and atmospheric. The feel for a world of the far away, in time and geography ~ it is set from AD895 ~ is powerful. The use of darkness, of fire, of lamplight, is exquisite. The main storyline is exciting, harrowing, and slightly familiar if you know your ‘Hamlet’. There is a great deal to enjoy. Some of the performances are really excellent.
However, I am sure you can sense the ‘But’! Because there are several. Principally, again, Eggers manages style over substance. The Telegraph’s Robbie Collins describes the film as ‘never knowingly undercooked’. Yes, quite!
Eggers gives many of his characters (notably Nicole Kidman) outrageous ‘Scandi’ accents. Why? Some are so broad as to be unintelligible. We know they were all talking various Norse languages and dialects, so leave well alone.
There are various religious and quasi-religious rituals shown, and magical dabblings, some of which look like Viking by way of Sioux or Arapaho. How authentic is this aspect? I have no idea, but much of it felt manipulative. So did some of the very liberal violence and widely strewn body parts.
There are some very derivative aspects too. Skarsgrd’s Amreth has been likened to Conan the Barbarian. I found him neither likeable nor sympathetic, and in the end, downright foolish.
My husband enjoyed ‘The Northman’ more than I did. Out of respect to him, I’ll award 4 Stars. I am not convinced.
It was instead implied that it would be just like all the other recent Viking offerings.
This is far more akin to Valhalla rising, than any of the other Viking related series.
It has that same weird vibe, where you find yourself thinking, yeah, this is how it really felt to be around at that time.
And as much as I loved the Viking series, and others, they look very contrived and “pretty” compared to the blunt reality of this. However, like the lighthouse before it, the director cannot help going way over the top on rather silly fantasy, and this at points almost damages the reality. He should also think about not over using some actors. I love willam Dafoe, but this guy seems to worship him, and he has a thing about Anya Taylor Joy, who is a great actress but is so distinctive looking that she can seem too familiar in some roles. If I had known nothing about this, and just come across it, I would think I had found a memorable little viking tale well worth the watch. Instead I was kind of disappointed that is was not what I expected it to be. If the late great Vikings series had had a bit more of the harsh reality of this movie, it would have been even better than it was IMHO. But if you are fan of that series then you may find this hard going.
It really isn’t bad. It kept me awake!
Don’t expect hordes of axe-wielding vikings..there are few actors in it..
It’s more of an adult fairy tale, and none the worse for that.
Great scenery and some bloody combat scenes.
Problem is, all antagonists seem to walk and move in a mysterious way – arms slightly out, legs flexed, rather Gumbyesque…and once the thought of Monty Python is planted..just have another scotch and enjoy the ride…
Alas, the final frames are pretty dire, but the idea was great – just so badly executed. Entry into Valhalla looked like a scene from Thunderbirds.
Still, worth a tenner of anybody’s money if you like this sort of thing – just don’t expect Ragnar and Rollo to pop in – it’s not like that..
I sat down to watch it while eating my dinner thinking it would be some deep epic Hollywood kind of story in a vibe of the ” Lord of the Rings”. And very soon I realised it was a bad idea, when the scene of the ritual initiation made me feel sick from the moment they used some sort of hallucinogenic potion .That nouciousness continued till the very end thanks to vivid images of numerous chopped off heads, mutilated arms and noses, pulled out intestines , pierced hearts ripped of the chest and a general slaughter. I must say the vibe is more like “Beowulf & Grendal”… Deep, dirty, dark ,heavy, prime and unapologetically realistic. The plot is built around hatred and brutal revenge therefore pretty much every action is filled with pain and cruelty.
Out of the positives… I heard before watching that costume was very consciously designed to be complimenting the historical accuracy…. I must say that part Is really impressive even thou it made the film less “spectacular” than for egz. “The Vikings”. The detail of accessories, embroidery, use of fabric and weapon…they even tried to get Nicole Kidman to do some tablet weaving in order to make it even more “Norse”… very poor attempt tho…as she pretends to weave with her finger. (?) Nontherless very interesting approach with a mix of Earthly realism and vast support of supernatural spirit forces (Bjrk was really amazing …just saying in case you are a fan…)
Overall I give 4 stars for an interesting picture but it is unlikely I will willingly watch it again…
This film gives something that is so rare in cinema these days and that is something that is a little different.
Its a viking saga and it doesnt try to be anything else. Its not another hollywood over the top action film where you can guess everything happening without ever looking up from your phone.
Music is great (expect , story is great, acting was great, thouroughly enjoyed all the way through.
So if youre just after more mindless action, then this proberly wont be for you, because the action in this tells a story, rather than the story just being action.
According to multiple interview sources Eggers took his inspiration from Saxo Grammaticus’s ‘History of the Danes’ , an English translation of Beowolf and the Old Norse story of Amleth which may have been the inspiration for Shakespeare’s Hamlet…It is a tale of tragic revenge and the futility of blood feuds and the havoc they reap. The cinematography is wonderful, the ensemble cast permit the viewer to see into a medieval world of human sacrifice, death fixations, fear, supernatural power and the harshness ,brutality and unforgiving nature of life back then.
I think it is probably an accurate depiction of medieval life and settlements, the lighting alone deserves a mention, it’s raw and unfettered, the interior shots reminded me a little of Coppola’s Apocalypse Now especially the interior scenes with Colonel Kurtz, I found it gripping and Alexander Skarsgard’s performance was resonant with inner rage and torment. No Abercrombie & Fitch Vikings here! Skal!