Polar Pacer – GPS Running Watch – High-Speed Processor –

Polar Pacer – GPS Running Watch – High-Speed Processor – Ultra-Light – Bright Display – Grip Buttons – Personalised Training Program & Recovery Tools – Heart Rate Monitor – Music Controls


running gps smart watch gps running watch for men womengps running watchgps running watch

24/7 Activity Tracking

Being active is important for your health, so it makes complete sense that tracking your activity all day, every day is important.

24/7 Activity Tracking will automatically count the moves you make and the steps you take.

Walking Test

Improving on something you can actually see is much more simple than guessing. VO2max is the ultimate figure to illustrate your aerobic fitness – and now finding it is as easy as going for a stroll.

Sleep Plus Stages

Getting enough quality sleep is vital for health and well-being. Sleep Plus Stages automatically tracks the amount and quality of your sleep and shows how long you spent in each sleep stage.

Nightly Recharge

See how well your body recovers from the demands of your day during the night – open your eyes to information you can use.

gps running watchgps running watchgps running watchgps running watchgps running watch
Pace, time, distance, laps & interval timer, stopwatch
Running program
Enhanced high-speed processor
Optimized MIP display
Advanced wrist-based heart rate tracking
Walking test, Running performance test, Leg recovery test Walking test Walking test, Running performance test Running performance test, Leg recovery test
Integrated barometer with wrist-based running power
Turn-by-Turn Guidance powered by komoot
Weight 40 g 41 g 51 g 45 g 52 g
Battery Life Up to 35h Training Mode (up to 100h w/ power-save options); up to 7 days in Watch Mode Up to 35h Training Mode (up to 100h w/ power-save options); up to 7 days in Watch Mode Up to 8h Training Mode; up to 5 days Watch Mode Up to 40h Training Mode (up to 100h w/ power-save options); up to 7 days Watch Mode Up to 40h Training Mode (up to 100h w/ power-save options); up to 7 days Watch Mode


Dimensions: 4.5 x 4.5 x 1.15 cm; 40 Grams
Model: 900102174
Batteries Included: 1 Lithium Polymer batteries required. (included)
Manufacture: Polar
Department: Unisex
Dimensions: 4.5 x 4.5 x 1.15 cm; 40 Grams
Origin: Malaysia

52 Responses

  1. VernitaJJN says:

     Germany

    Golden Review Award: 3 From Our UsersIch nutze die Uhr jetzt seit 1 Jahr und habe davor 3 FitnessUhren von Groen Herstellern(davon eine weitere mit dem Kernfokus auf Intensives laufen) Uhren. Aus meiner Sicht sind die Unterschiede zwischen den Uhren in der selben Generation marginal. Auch das man bei dieser Polar keine Touchfunktionen hat strt wenig bis gar nicht und man gewhnt sich recht schnell an die Bedienung. Das Dashboard auf der App ist bersichtlich und liefert einen Guten Einblick in den Tagesverlauf. Aber auch da wrde ich sagen das die Daten anderer Hersteller sehr hnlich sind in der selben Preisklasse und Technologie. Den zustzlichen Herzfrequenzmesser nutze ist wenig bis gar nicht. War mehr eine Spielerei zu beginn. Funktioniert aber einwandfrei und liefert gute Werte die nicht nur die Leistung sondern auch die Auslastung der krperlichen Aktivitt widerspiegeln. Bei all diesen Messgerten und Apps ist natrlich zu beachten das Sie medizinisch geprften Gerten nicht nachkommen und man diese Funktionen nicht zur Hilfestellung Gesundheitlicher Einschrnkungen nutzen sollte!
    Der Leistungsfokus liegt hier nicht auf “Schritten” sondern in einem Ausgewogenen Angebot aus Cardeo, Kraft & Sttzendes Training, welches eine Vielzahl an bungen liefert die man tglich absolvieren kann. Die Uhr warnt anhand von deinen Leistungswerten auf ber und Unterforderung und motiviert mit vielen Gesundheits & Sporthinweisen in der App deine allgemeine Fitness/Gesundheit zu frdern.

    Warum ich die Polar Uhr gewhlt habe war um einerseits etwas neues aus zu probieren und andererseits weil es Hersteller in der EU ist! Ich bereue das aber bis heute nicht, es ausprobiert zu haben. Die Funktionen und auch die Uhr selbst werden mit sehr hoher Qualitt angeboten. Meine nchste sollte es Bahnbrechende neue Technologien geben, wird wieder ein Polar!

  2. Anonymous says:

     Germany

    Da meine defekte Polar Vantage M2 Multisportuhr beim Polar Kundenservice in Holland eingeschickt war,habe ich mir die rosa Pacer als Amazonretourenschnppchen fr 138,15 ,als Zweituhr bestellt.Der Urlaub stand bevor und ich wollte nicht ohne Uhr verreisen,vor allem weil ich dort auch trainieren wollte.
    Die Uhr hatte keinerlei Gebrauchsspuren,lediglich der Karton war aufgerissen und die Displayschutzfolie fehlte.
    Die Pacer wird als Laufuhr verkauft,hat aber alle Funktionen die meine erheblich teurere Vantage M2 Multisportuhr auch hat.Sie hat wie die Vantage M2 kein Touchdisplay,was mit verschwitzten Hnden eh nicht zu bedienen wre und dieses Display was das Sonnenlicht reflektiert und drauen in der Sonne gut abzulesen ist.Drinnen ist es etwas schlechter abzulesen,da kann man aber die Hintergrundbeleuchtung einschalten.
    Die Pulsmessung am Handgelenk funktioniert sehr gut,verglichen mit Brustgurt,zeigt sie etwas Zeitverzgert,starke pltzliche nderungen an.
    Im Urlaub hatte die Uhr gleich den Hrtetest mit Aqua Aerobic im Salzwasserpool oder Meer,schwimmen im Meer,Sand am Strand etc,einmal kurz unter den Wasserhahn gehalten und sieht wieder aus wie neu.Das hat ihr alles nichts ausgemacht.
    Ansonsten hab ich bisher radfahren,wandern,Spinning,Bodypump ( sie hat auch Les Mills Kurse bei den Sportprofilen) Zumba und Step Aerobic getrackt.Alles hat wunderbar funktioniert und das GPS ist auch ziemlich genau.
    Sie ist mit 40 g auch nicht so schwer und klobig wie andere Polar Modelle und fr Damen geeignet.Ich hab ein schmales Handgelenk und sowas wie Grit X oder Vantage V2 gehen bei mir gar nicht.

  3. peanutpeak says:

     Spai

    Muy buena calidad precio, y es que ofrece rutas por giro, vatios corriendo, segmentos en vivo de strava….adems de las funciones tpicas de Polar de sueo y SNA, monitoreo de la actividad, estado de la carga y entrenamiento, GPS, pulso en la mueca, etc.

    Buena calidad-precio

  4. Anonymous says:

     United States

    As an athlete and soldier in the Army, i find this pacer to be amazing alongside polars chest heart rate monitor. It really helps me correlate my heart rate to my rate of exertion. I was an off and on runner before but now im trying to drop my 2 mile time and prepare for marathons and these two polar products are definitely helping me get that mind body connection that i was originally only used to from weight lifting.

  5. Anonymous says:

     Italy

    Golden Review Award: 2 From Our UsersHo riflettuto molto prima di fare questo acquisto. Ed stato un acquisto mirato. Dopo averlo usato in modo intenso per pi di 1 settimana posso dire che sono rimasto piacevolmente soddisfatto delle sue funzionalit in allenamento (corsa e nuoto) sia nel monitoraggio delle fasi di recupero. Come sempre POLAR ad altezza sia nella raccolta dei dati che nel loro analisi. Molto soddisfatto!

  6. Anonymous says:

     United States

    This version has several improvements that I appreciate:

    Magnetic charge/sync cord attachment – great improvement!
    More sensors for wrist based heart rate – improved accuracy.
    Works great with the H10 heart rate strap.
    Integrates well with the Polar sync app; seamless transition.
    I use the continuous heart rate monitoring; great feature.
    I only take it off to recharge every three days.
    Sleep monitoring/evaluation is the only feature that I’m not 100% happy with. It sometimes misses a night’s sleep and I have to manually enter the times sleep began and ended.

    Overall, very happy with the watch!

  7. Wendell0919 says:

     Spai

    Antes ya tena un reloj de Polar. Prefera seguir con la misma marca y ha sido todo un acierto. El reloj tiene muy buena batera y muy buena conexin a los satlites. No le cuesta mucho geoposicioarte y una vez que ha conseguido la seal de los satlites no la pierde, aunque vayas por la montaa barrancos etc. Tiene muy buena precisin.
    Llevo ya utilizndolo unos meses y estoy muy satisfecho con la compra.

  8. Anonymous says:

     United States

    Bought this for an upgrade to my old Polar Ignite because I wanted the increased GPS accuracy and thot the altimeter would be fun. But it’s tough to see the screen even in diffused light. Guess my eyes are spoiled.

    For reference to anybody worried about size., tho. I have a 5.75″ wrist and while a bit bigger than the ignite, it didn’t look huge, and sat in my wrist fine.

  9. Anonymous says:

     Germany

    Sobald man sich an die typische, aber eigenwillige Menfhrung gewhnt hat, kommt man mit dem Polar Pacer bestens zurecht. Die Aufzeichnungen lassen sich ber die Handyapp oder ber einen Webzugang auswerten und sind polartypisch sehr umfangreich. Auch die Smartwatchfunktionen sind fr mich ausreichend. Sowohl die Pulsmessung, die Aufzeichnungen von Trainingsstrecken als auch die Schlafaufzeichnungen scheinen sehr genau zu sein.

  10. Anonymous says:

     Germany

    Sehr zufrieden mit dem Artikel, trage sie tglich u nutze die Funktionen der App.

  11. EllenSisco says:

     Spai

    No es el primer reloj polar que tengo ni ser el ltimo, el reloj es bonito y muy ligero, la batera dura bastante, lo nico que no me convence es la precisin del pulso al tomarlo en la mueca fallo no siempre pero falla y las comparado con todos los dems que he usado que el sensor iba en el pecho y casi no fallaban , an as lo recomiendo

  12. Anonymous says:

     France

    Cette montre est de bonne facture, son design est trs sobre, les boutons sont de bonnes qualits.
    L’cran lcd est en couleur avec un bon rtro clairage. La navigation est rapide.
    Le gps et trs prcis, le baromtre pas encore test.
    La recharge de la batterie est trs rapide et le transfert des donnes via le tlphone est trs rapide aussi.
    Elle a un mode surveillance du sommeil et un suivi des performances sportives. Mais encore, il y a des programmes de fitness, de repos, de relaxation, de ravitaillement en eau et glucides.. bref je ne vais pas tout citer !

    Par ailleurs, au del du sport, son design et sa lgret, cette montre se mlange bien avec une tenue de soire.

    Pour conclure, cette montre est complte, elle est cre pour nous propulser. Je la recommande comme compagnon du sport, c’est un bijou de technologie !

    Concernant la vido, je n’arrive pas la manipuler d’une seule main, mais je vous assure c’est une belle montre. Offrez-vous la !

    Ultra légère et complète pour le spo

  13. Nichole5729 says:

     Germany

    Ich bin mit der Uhr und deren Funktionen sehr zufrieden. Einfache Bedienung, sinnvolle Anzeigen. Ist mit der Polar-App synchronisierbar.

  14. Anonymous says:

     Germany

    Bin super zufrieden mit der Uhr.
    Benutzte sie beim Laufen und Schwimmen.
    Akku hlt super lang und bin soweit top zufrieden mit den produkten von Pola

  15. OFCBrookly says:

     France

    J’ai remplac ma montre UNITE dont le bouton tait devenu inefficace par cette PACER.
    Elle est bien plus lisible avec une autonomie de prs d’une semaine pour l’usage que j’en fais.
    Je l’utilise essentiellement pour monitoriser pendant les efforts ma frquence cardiaque mise mal par le vaccin coronavirus.

  16. ZandraTCVW says:

     United States

    I ride my bike often and wanted a monitor that isn’t a chest strap. This watch picks up my heart rate very easily and works very well. It has tons of features that I don’t use but that’s fine, I use it just when I ride. My only complaint is that I have to pair it with my phone literally every time I ride. This is very annoying. I use run keeper on my phone that is mounted to my bars and I like to have the current heart rate on the display. The watch collects lots of data, average, peak etc. and I’ll look at that when I get back, I just want to see the current on my phone display. I use tons of blue tooth devices and the only one I have to pair every time I use it is this one. Wish some smart engineer could fix that one issue. Other than that it’s a nice product and worth the price.

  17. Anonymous says:

     Germany

    Misst zuverlssig meinen Alltagspuls, schne Sportprofile bzw Fahrradfahren, e-bike sogar dabei, yoga, Kraftsport und soweiter…

    Wenn der Puls Explosionsartig schnell nach oben geht empfiehlt sich immer noch ein Brustgurt aber das ist ja normal das alle Uhren am Handgelenk damit nicht umgehen knnen wenn es um schnelle Erkennung geht…

    Allerdings die Konnektivitt mit dem Smartphone lsst zu wnschen brig, eine permanente Verbindung ist nicht wirklich mglich mit den Notification aber ich benutze die uhr sowieso nur als reine sportuhr, da brauche ich solch ein Kram nicht…

    GPS funktioniert tadellos und sehr genau bin damit super zufrieden…

  18. Anonymous says:

     Italy

    Arrivo da Garmin Fr235.
    Ho voluto passare a Polar, passaggio perfetto
    Il sensore cardiaco lavora in modo preciso e stabile.
    Quello che non avevo nel Garmin
    Ottimo Smartwatch per correre

    Agg dopo 5 mesi di utilizzo:
    MANCANO I SUONI DURANTE L’ALLENAMENTO!
    La sola vibrazione non compensa questa mancanza!!!
    Ho scritto a Polar,ma niente….non hanno voglia di rilasciare un aggiornamento software che attivi i suoni.
    Delusione
    ACQUISTO SBAGLIATO…
    Mi dispiace moltissimo in quanto il sensore FC e GPS funzionano alla grande,ma i suoni sono fondamentali per allenarsi!

    11/09/23 Aggiornamento
    Ribadisco l’ottimo sensore al polso e il gps.
    Ma…LA MANCANZA DI SUONI E DAVVERO VERGOGNOSA DA PARTE DI UN AZIENDA LEADER IN QUESTI DISPOSITIVI!!!
    Ieri mi sono allenato in dei cambi di ritmo per…..
    Usando il vecchio Garmin FR235 che ha il sensore al polso rotto,ma i suoni sono presenti e i cambi da una fase all’altra si sentono!!!
    DELUSIONE ASSOLUTA!!!!!!!!!

    17/09/23 Aggiornamento
    Questa mattina ho fatto un lungo collinare da 22k.
    Ho provato ad indossarlo sul polso destro,in quando essendo destroide dovrei avere pi sensibilit…
    Pensa te che si deve fare per non buttare un orologio quasi perfetto!(REPARTO RICERCA E SVILUPPO POLAR SVILUPPATE/RILASCIATE NUOVO SOFTWARE CHE INCLUDA L’ATTIVAZIONE DEI SUONI DI NOTIFICA DURANTE L’ALLENAMENTO!!!!! SEMPRE SE CI SIA HARDWARE INTERNO CHE GLI ATTIVI).
    Ritorniamo a questa mattina… risultato con il cambio di polso la vibrazione stata percepita qualcosina di pi,ma qualche km non l’ ho proprio sentito

  19. JanineBenge says:

     Germany

    My priority is a sports watch.
    This watch has fantastic, configurable displays for a number of sports.
    This means that you don’t have useless information retracting from what you actually want to know.
    It’s comfortable and easy to wear.
    I’m so happy that I don’t have wrestle with a touch screen during exercise. The buttons are easy to use.
    My highest priority is reliable heart monitoring, which I can read at 50+, as I normally need weak reading glasses.
    This watch fulfills this goal.
    I have gone running yet, but there are certainly plenty of features to try out, which I didn’t need in the gym.
    I’m looking forward to this.
    I had a polar watch over 20 years ago. I was delighted then, but didn’t prioritise a decent watch again until now, as I finally have time for significantly more sport again. After such a long gap, I’m really happy that Polar hasn’t lost it’s focus.

  20. MinnChica says:

     United Kingdom

    Not had a fitness watch before so went for one with all the features.
    Probably too good for my usage but a very good watch.
    Takes a bit of time to learn how to use it and the polar app.
    Pleased with it so far.

  21. Heather Poole says:

     Singapore

    I like this watch more and more as I use it. It’s simple but reliable. Quick to connect to gps and has all the features one requires. The report and analysis features are great with Polar watches. Battery life is very good. It is so lightweight and comfortable. One complain I have is that there is a lag on the backlight when you lift up your wrist to read the time.

  22. ClydePVOoawlur says:

     United Kingdom

    This is a really good smart watch that works well. It’s especially good when exercising, and seems accurate. Four stars.

  23. Anonymous says:

     Germany

    Golden Review Award: 3 From Our UsersPolar M400 Versus Polar Pacer Pro

    Nach Ca. 2 Jahren meiner Polar M400, habe ich mir endlich mal eine neue Polar Uhr gegnnt. Es musste eine Polar sein, da ich das Programm “Polarflow” aktiv nutze und meine Sportliche Aktivitt beobachte bzw. Dokumentiere.

    Die Polar Pacer Pro kam im April 2022 raus und ist bis heutigen Stand keine 365 Tage alt. Bzw. ist sie seitdem Datum im Angebot.

    Die meisten Funktionen hab ich gleich abgestellt, da ich z.B. Permanente Pulsberwachung oder “LED Beleuchtung geht an, wenn die Hand gehoben wird” nicht bentige. Auch Wetterdaten brauche ich nicht angezeigt, dafr hab ich PC bzw. Smartphone ODER sogar ein Fenster. Mir geht es im Endeffekt nur um meine Leistung zu berwachen und zu Dokumentieren.

    Meine M400 ist noch voll Intakt und auch der Akku hlt ohne Aufnahme noch locker 2+ Monate. Sie ist immer noch 3/4 voll. Letzte Aufladung war am 5. Januar 2023. Was mich halt bei der M400 gro gestrt hat ist, dass sie teils 3-5 Minuten gebraucht hatte, um GPS zu finden. Zwar war es immer Stabil, sobald gefunden. Aber das warten war Anstrengend. Da stehst erst einmal bis 5min vor der Tr, um loszufahren, aber GPS sucht noch. Ich denke, dass die Technologie und dessen Satellit zu “alt” sind. Die Pacer Pro verbindet sich ruckzuck!

    Ein weiterer Vorteil der Pacer Pro ist z.B. Hhenmeter. Er zeigt dir auf die Strecke sogar an, wo man Hoch/Runter ging/fuhr mit Zeit Stempel und alles drum und dran. Das Features ist sowas von echt gut.

    Kommen wir zum Akku:
    Der Akku der M400 hlt ohne GPS locker 2+ Monate. Nach einem Monat noch 3/4 Akku brig. Sobald ich damals immer GPS genutzt hatte, konnte ich hchstens 2-3 Tage mit 1 Stunde Fahren nutzen. Also bei vollgeladen und etwa 2x Training a=2 Stunden, war der Akku fast leer.

    Die Pacer Pro hab ich am 30. Januar 2023 bekommen und da aufgeladen. Bis heute zum Rezension schreiben liegt der Akku bei 34% – wie gesagt, ohne Pulsberwachung, Wetterdaten und LED Beleuchtung nur auf Knopfdruck etc. MIT diesen ganzen Features war der Akku bei Zustellung nach 1 Stunde bereits um 5% gesunken!!! Ich habe seit der Zustellung schon 5x Training gemacht mit je 1 Stunde Radfahren. Zudem zeigt die Pacer Pro an, wie viele Stunden GPS noch mglich ist. Mit 34% Akku sagt sie
    noch etwa 10 Stunden mglich.

    Zur Herzschlagberwachung nutze ich ein separates Brustband, das “moofit HR8”, gibt es auch hier in Amazon (B0BBLPBXL8). Das hat sich ohne Probleme sofort mit der Uhr Verbunden. Aber Achtung! Der Brustgurt sollte beim ersten Mal angelegt werden (Brust/Herz), da er sonst nicht aktiv ist und die Uhr das Brustband nicht findet… das war mein Fehler. Danach verbindet es sich immer sofort.

    Zurzeit nutze ich die Pacer Pro fr Radfahren und “Gehen” bzw. Spazieren gehen. Es gibt weit aus mehr Profile, z.B. Schwimmen, Krafttraining etc. eventuell muss man sich die irgendwie Laden.

    Um die Daten zu Synchronisieren gibt es das USB Kabel per PC oder wie ich es mache, mit Smartphone. Dazu muss die App installiert sein und dann drckt man Ca. 3 Sekunden die “Zurck-Taste” und die Daten werden mit dem Smartphone Synchronisiert. Das ist sehr bequem und dauert kaum 10-20 Sekunden. Bei meiner M400 dauerte ein Training bis 3-4 Minuten per Kabel.

    Ich kann nur sagen bislang: SUPER zufrieden und der Preis stimmt absolut. Die M400 gibt es immer noch teils fr 150 oder mehr aber hat veraltete Technologie etc. Sowohl die M400 und die Pacer Pro haben kein Touchscreen. Das strt mich aber nicht. Ich hoffe sehr, dass Polar auch in Zukunft weiter Uhren herstellt und Verkauft.

    Die Uhr ist einfach zu Bedienen und das Programm “PolarFlow” einfach zu nutzen und hat eine gute bersicht.

    Super Uhr, echt Zufrieden!

  24. Anonymous says:

     Spai

    Que puedo decir de este pedazo reloj, que me cant,
    Pros: autonoma 6dias usados a top, Gym,bici,tuning, precisin absolutamente en GPS y cardio, estudio del sueo muy preciso y seguimientos de tus entrenamientos, interfaz polar me encanta,la pantalla retroiluminacin por la luz se ve estupenda.peso y colores estticamente es muy bonito.
    Contras: precio si no lo encuentras en oferta,la colocacin de los botones estn echos para zurdos,el GPS al empezar es rpido en encontrar pero los eh visto de ms rpidos por la competencia y ms antiguos que est, tiene una infinidad de deportes a elegir pero con trampa porque no ah muchas diferencias entre ellas.
    Solo puedo terminar diciendo de este reloj que si as tenido un Polar este reloj no te decepciona.super contento con mi reloj Polar Pacer pro junto mi Banda pectoral H10.
    1 mes de uso y el reloj a dejado de cargar,un imn se a salido como muestro en la foto y no ah forma de cargar el reloj,me puesto en contacto con servicio tcnico y estoy a la espera de reparacin,comentar que estoy bastante contento con el reloj pero algo molesto con lo sucedido ya que lo cuido incluso ni me ducho con el reloj y con 1 mes no me esperaba esto.escribire experiencia con el servicio tcnico.
    14 das y ya tengo de nuevo mi reloj, estoy Muy content,me quedo corto!, decir para como positivo que el servicio tcnico est a la altura del reloj,sin mareos,sin escaqueos se icieron carg de la reparacin del imn,para m sorpresa me enviaron un reloj Nuevo y no me lo esperaba, vuelvo a repetir que el servicio tcnico est a la altura de la Marca y es estupendo,como contra decir que no ah servicio tcnico en Espaa,el reloj se enva a Holanda y eso Ace que tengas que esperar con paciencia el reloj reparado, quiero terminar agradeciendo a polar por solucionar mi problema.gracias!

    Mi polar Pacer pro favorito!

  25. ChristiZug says:

     United Kingdom

    Have tried numerous Polar watches in the past and none impressed at all, but the Pacer Pro is very different. Light and easily comfortable for 24hr wear, glitch free bluetooth sync with the app which now (finally!) works with Google Fit. This one is for keeps.

  26. Anonymous says:

     Spai

    Golden Review Award: 3 From Our UsersCompr este reloj deportivo de polar hace unos dos meses, por lo que puedo dar una opinin de cmo me ha ido en este tiempo:

    -Esttica/Comodidad: el apartado esttico es algo personal, en mi caso me gusta porque es un reloj bonito y discreto. Es un reloj ligero por lo que es muy cmodo para llevarlo en el da a da, y tambin para dormir con l.

    – GPS: en espacios abiertos, tarda poco en pillar la seal para poder iniciar la actividad. Cuando ests entre edificios, le cuesta ms en pillarlo o en das nublados tambin tarda ms. Cmo consejo, si te desplazas a otra ciudad para una carrera, pon el reloj para empezar la actividad para que pille seal gps, y el da de la carrera tardar menos. En relacin a la distancia no hay sobresaltos. Cuando voy con la MTB da una distancia similar ( sin diferencias notables) a mi ciclocomputador Garmin.

    -Pantalla: la pantalla no es tctil sino que te desplazas con los botones fsicos que lleva el reloj. Para hacer deporte, en mi opinin, es ms cmodo con botones que pantalla tctil ( por experiencia con el ignite). En cuanto a visibilidad se ve muy bien en la mayora de condiciones.

    – Procesador: el reloj va muy fluido, y puedes moverte por las distintas pantallas que tiene:pasos realizados en el da, estado del entrenamiento (bajo, mantenimiento, productivo o sobrecarga), frecuencia cardaca, ltimo entrenamiento, nightly recharge (calidad de sueo), entrenamiento que te recomienda el entrenador virtual (fitspark), meteorologa, tiempo de entreno semanal.

    – Detector frecuencia cardaca: el nuevo sensor funciona realmente bien. No tengo picos raros de frecuencia ni cuando hago series a ritmo alto. Cuando me pongo cinta cardaca con otro dispositivo y coincide en la media, aunque si hay en el tiempo que he estado en cada zona cardaca durante mi actividad. Creo que para un uso amateur es ms que suficiente. Adems, el reloj permite conectar una banda de pecho por ejemplo.

    – Rendimiento en running: hay varios perfiles como atletismo, correr o running en asfalto. Puedes modificar la informacin que ves en pantalla, y puedes moverte por diferentes interfaz en las que puedes ver ritmo cardaco medio, mximo o mnimo, pendientes realizadas, potencia de carrera ( es de los pocos relojes que permiten obtener datos de potencia sin sensor externo). Puedes poner ritmo objetivo de ritmos de carrera, intervalos ( prefiero hacer ese tipo de entrenamiento en la app de polar flow), rutas, volver sobre la ruta, etc. Es un reloj muy completo para corredores.
    -Trail running: similar a lo comentado para running, aunque aqu cabe mencionar el barmetro que servir para darte una altitud ms exacta, y la funcin Hill Slplitter se encargar de detectar cada ascenso y descenso que haces (est funcin est tambin en ciclismo de montaa). Tambin puedes ver la altitud en la que ests, ascenso total y descenso, al igual que el porcentaje de pendiente que ests realizando en ese momento. Ests funciones tambin estn en running. Para hacer trail running se defiende bien, aunque su mayor rendimiento es para running, especialmente porque no est construido de materiales ms resistentes como otros relojes outdoor.

    -Batera: en mi caso no me aguanta los 7 das que dicen que durar, incluso sin tener las notificaciones del mvil conectadas. Suele durarme unos 4 das aproximadamente, pero los deportes que ms realiz son al aire libre, utilizando el GPS con la mayor precisin. En cuanto a batera para carreras, con el 100% de batera da para unas 35h que no he llegado a probarlo. Si bajas de precisin el GPS puedes hacer ms horas. Para corredores de media o maratn en asfalto, trail de 40 o 50km no tendrn problemas de batera.

    -Sueo: llevo aos con polar y creo que funciona bastante bien, tanto el ignite que tuve como este pacer pro.
    – Otras cuestiones: en relacin con el Fitspark, app de polar, entrenamientos programados (5k,10k,21k, etc.) No lo he utilizado en profundidad. En relacin al fitspark est bien como gua de entrenamiento.

    Para concluir, decir que me parece una buena compra, da mucho a un precio contenido (especialmente junto a la app polar flow). Cosas que mejorara: mayor rapidez del GPS que en ocasiones tarda y una mayor duracin de batera.

    Buena calidad-precio

  27. Anonymous says:

     Spai

    Golden Review Award: 8 From Our UsersEncontr este Polar Pacer a un precio inusualmente bajo y decid probarlo. La sensacin que me ha dejado es agridulce: tiene muchas cosas que me gustan, pero tambin unas cuantas que no y que me haran difcil o imposible acostumbrarme a l. Lo he usado ininterrumpidamente durante una semana y, francamente, al quitrmelo di un suspiro de alivio. Aqu va mi explicacin y mi opinin, que es muy personal.

    Lo que me gusta:
    el display del reloj tiene muy buena claridad, y adems Polar presenta los datos de forma atractiva a todo color. Los sensores de mueca son (relativamente) fiables, y la batera dura bastante y se carga con rapidez. El anlisis del sueo es muy bueno, espectacular.

    Me gusta menos:
    – para mi tamao de mueca resulta algo grande (45 mm) y grueso. No me importa durante el da, pero para dormir si me resulta incmodo.
    – las acciones que realizan y el tamao de los botones los veo engorrosos y nada lgicos, yo opino que estn mal pensados: para empezar a hacer cualquier cosa (ejercicio, retocar ajustes, etc) tienes que usar el boton ‘Back’, lo cual no es precisamente intuitivo… Adems, aunque se usa para todo, ese botn apenas sobresale del perfil del reloj, me resulta imposible encontrarlo sin mirar y presionarlo con exactitud. En cambio el botn ‘Start’ sobresale bastante, es de mayor tamao, se localiza sin mirar, es rojo y… apenas se usa? Francamente, no lo entiendo.

    El sensor cardaco de mueca merece su propio comentario. He comprobado su funcionamiento varios das llevando al mismo tiempo una banda de pecho (de marca Polar, por cierto, pero conectada a un reloj Garmin). En general la precisin de la frecuencia cardaca en la mueca tal como la mide el Polar Pacer es muy buena. Sobre todo me ha sorprendido lo rpido que sigue los cambios de pulsaciones, tanto al incrementar como al disminuir. Es justo lo que todo usuario desea en estos dispositivos de mueca, que su respuesta a los cambios sea igual de rpida que una banda de pecho. El Pacer casi lo consigue, as que hay que felicitar a Polar.
    Por otro lado, he encontrado que en ocasiones el sensor se volva un poco loco y marcaba pulsaciones que no tenan nada que ver. Por ejemplo yo tena 90 y l marcaba 130, o yo tena 110 y el marcaba 150. Estas ‘crisis’ le duraban al reloj 15 o 30 segundos, despus ya volva a marcar bien. Naturalmente no puedo saber si esos ‘ataques’ son algo general o solo de mi dispositivo concreto.

  28. Rahul Srinivas says:

     Brazil 🇧🇷

    Comprei o relgio Polar no dia 05/11/2022 por R$1.524,56 (vendido e entregue pela Amazon). A entrega foi feita por intermdio da Dilogo Logstica e chegou no dia 08/11/2022. A nota fiscal foi disponibilizada no dia seguinte.

    Na caixa vem o relgio, carregador usb, parte da pulseira extra e a garantia e o guia de introduo

    Pluguei o relgio no notebook e em 30 minutos conclu a configurao do relgio (parece uma eternidade – risos). O relgio veio com 73% de bateria. Deixei carregando (no usb do notebook) at completar 100% (o que demorou cerca de 30 minutos – espera-se, ento, pelo carregamento via usb/notebook, que demore cerca de duas horas para carregar toda carga pelo tempo de durao da bateria que a marca informa, no acho que isso seja algo ruim).

    Tempo de durao da bateria: o relgio est ligado desde s 15h do dia 08/11/2022. At o momento utilizei cerca de 2/3 horas de atividade fsica (com gps e monitorao de batimentos) e mais anlise de duas noites de sono, alm das funes normais do relgio = est com 58% de bateria.

    Eu estava com dvidas entre este relgio e o Garmin 55, mas optei pelo Polar por no ouvir bons comentrios a respeito da assistncia tcnica da Garmin no Brasil (contatei alguns vendedores de Garmin, da Amazon, e estes informaram que forneciam um ano de garantia, mas no senti segurana para fazer isso. Pensei no Garmin 245, mas vi tantos relatos de problemas na tela que acabei desistindo dessa opo

    Por que no o Polar Pacer Pro? O Pacer Pro tem algumas funes que para mim, corredor amador, so inteis, tais como: barmetro, medidor de potncia, orientao komoot e hill splitter – informaes do Tnis Certo. Se fizer sentido para voc, acredito que vale a pena o investimento a mais

    Sobre o relgio: ele tem um tamanho perfeito para mim, no aquele exagero do Polar Vantage V, mas penso que a Polar poderia ter aproveitado melhor o espao de tela til, pois cerca de meio milmetro da tela no tem nada, s parte da estrutura do relgio. Algumas pessoas vo achar pequeno, vejam as fotos dessa anlise (meu punho tem 19 centmetros)

    bem tranquilo de visualizar as informaes mesmo sob um sol intenso (que o mnimo que se espera de relgios GPS, mas a qualidade, nesse ponto, realmente surpreendeu)

    Ele muito leve (40g) e a pulseira parece super frgil, sim, parece frgil, vamos ver se ou no

    Ele tem um programa de treinos que se adapta conforme o teu rendimento (tipo um Garmin Coach), o que foi um dos pontos que fez optar por esse relgio (Os relgios Polar Unite e Ignite no so para quem quer correr de forma um pouco mais sria e planejada). No polar flow voc configura seus treinos e verifica todas as informaes ( possvel reorganizar os treinos, alternando os exerccios conforme a disponibilidade maior/menor de um dia para outro)

    Gostei de ter controle de msica no relgio, a voc no precisa acessar o celular ou ficar utilizando o prprio fone para isso (ele no armazena msicas, mas voc pode parar ou mudar a msica que est tocando no celular)

    Eu criei um perfil no instagram para contar um pouco sobre o relgio e sobre a minha trajetria de corredor ultra amador rs, ainda tem pouco contedo, mas @correndodepolar (quaisquer dvidas, podem falar por l)

    Saiba o que você precisa para um relógio GPS e não se arrependa

  29. Anonymous says:

     Germany

    Golden Review Award: 10 From Our UsersDie Polar Pacer ist fr mich der Ersatz fr meine Polar A300, die eigentlich (fast) alles kann, was ich will bzw. brauche – aber Polar Pacer kann alles deutlich besser und hat einige tolle Features zustzlich, die ich nicht mehr missen mchte:

    Herzfrequenzmessung direkt mit der Uhr ohne Brustgurt funktioniert berraschend gut und genau. Habe mehrfach parallel mit dem Brustgurt (Polar H10) gemessen, und die Messungen waren meist exakt gleich und nur manchmal um 1-2 Schlge unterschiedlich.
    Ebenfalls positiv berrascht mich, dass man die Uhr fr die korrekte Messung zwar recht fest zumachen muss, damit die Uhrenrckseite konstant Hautkontakt hat, aber dennoch fhlt es sich nicht zu eng, einschnrend oder unangenehm an.

    Deep Teal ist ein wunderschnes Blaugrn, und berhaupt sieht die Polar Pacer sehr hbsch, fast elegant aus, so dass man sie wirklich problemlos zu so ziemlich jeder Gelegenheit und nicht nur zum Sport tragen kann.

    Das Farb-Display ist sehr gut lesbar – es dunkelt automatisch ab und wird durch die Handbewegung automatisch beleuchtet, wenn man auf die Uhr schaut. Man kann es auch noch zustzlich beleuchten.
    Das Design lsst sich auch ein wenig anpassen: Man kann zwischen Analog-Uhr und Digital-Uhr whlen (jeweils in mehreren Designs und Farbakzenten), und man kann auswhlen, was alles am Display angezeigt werden soll.

    Wirklich gut finde ich, dass die Pacer kein Touchdisplay hat: Das spart Akku, man kann nicht versehentlich irgendwas drcken bzw. gibt es kein Problem bei Regen oder mit sonstigen nassen Fingern, die die Bedienung von Touchdisplays oft sehr erschweren.

    Wer mit der Polar-Bedienlogik vertraut ist, hat keine Probleme alles Wesentliche zu finden. Die 5 Bedienknpfe funktionieren genauso wie zB bei meiner alten Polar A300:
    Links oben: Displaybeleuchtung
    Links unten: Stop bzw. Zurck + Verbindung zur Polar Flow App
    Rechts oben und unten: Hinauf bzw. hinunter scrollen
    Rechts Mitte: Okay

    Ein paar kleine Unterschiede gibt es auch, man findet aber im Grunde alles intuitiv.

    Mit den 5 Knpfen selbst bin ich persnlich allerdings nicht ganz glcklich: Meine A300 hat relativ flache, aber gut sprbare, runde, glatte Knpfe aus Metall, die sich gut drcken lassen. Die Pacer hat lngliche, extrem flache Druckknpfe aus Kunststoff (vermute ich), die eine extrem aufgeraute Oberflche haben, wodurch sie gut sprbar sind – dadurch, dass man sie relativ fest drcken muss, finde ich die Bedienung aber nicht annhernd so angenehm wie bei der A300.
    Beim Einrichten und anfnglichen Herumprobieren und vielfachen Herumdrcken, um das Gert wirklich gut kennenzulernen, waren die rauen Druckknpfe dann schon richtig unangenehm auf den Fingerspitzen. Beim tglichen Gebrauch ist das kein Problem, aber die wirklich gute Bedienung mittels der runden Metallknpfe wie bei der A300 mit dem irgendwie viel besseren Druckpunkt fehlt mir.

    Was mich allerdings echt beeindruckt und begeistert sind div. Auswertungen – auf der Uhr im berblick, in der Flow App dann sehr detailliert.

    Was mir auch besonders gut gefllt: Neben dem Fitness Test, den ich bereits von meiner A300 kenne, gibt es auch noch einen Walking-Test und einen Lauftest, die noch genauer sind als der Fitness Test.

    Die Polar Pacer Pro ist aktuell mit ca 100 um knapp 50 % teurer als die Polar Pacer – da mir Hhenmesser und Kompass und die paar anderen zustzlichen Funktionen wie Einbindung von Komoot-Routen nicht wichtig sind, ist die Polar Pacer fr mich die richtige Wahl.
    Zwar hat sich die Hhenmessung ber GPS bisher als berraschend ungenau erwiesen (zeigte bisher immer zwischen 40 und 130 m zu viel an), ein besserer Hhenmesser wre mir aber keine 100 wert. Bin reiner Hobbysportler und brauche das nicht wirklich.

    Alles in allem bin ich hoch zufrieden mit dieser Sportuhr: Das wirklich schne Design, die lange Akkulaufzeit (7 Tage, obwohl ich immer noch stndig damit herumspiele und unbedingt mehrmals tglich mit der App synchronisieren muss ;-)) und die sehr umfangreichen und informativen Auswertungen begeistern mich sehr!

    Die nicht so tollen Bedienknpfe und die vllig unzuverlssige Hhenmeter-Angaben finde ich schade, schmlern meine Freude aber nicht sehr: Fr mich Hobbysportler ist die Polar Pacer wirklich die perfekte Wahl.

    Nachtrag: Nachdem ich eine Polar Pacer Pro ausprobieren konnte, war ich wirklich extrem hin und her gerissen, welches Modell mir besser gefllt.
    Die Pacer Pro hat einige Features zustzlich, die mich nicht so reizen, aber sicher fr andere Nutzer toll sind: zB Kompass, Komoot-Touren hochladen und Routen-Verfolgung direkt auf der Uhr.
    Der Hhenmesser der Polar Pro funktioniert gut und liefert (im Gegensatz zu den Hhenangaben der Pacer) realistische Werte.

    Der Knackpunkt fr mich war und ist aber die Haptik der Bedienknpfe: Bei der Pacer Pro sind sie ebenfalls lnglich und eher flach, bestehen aber aus anderem Material (Aluminium?) und fhlen sich dadurch um Klassen wertiger an. Und die Bedienung ist dadurch ebenfalls sehr viel besser.

    Dem gegenber steht ein hherer Preis, sie kostet aber im Angebot nur noch gut 50 mehr als die Pacer.

    Schlussendlich habe ich mich dann doch fr die deutlich hherwertige Haptik und bessere Bedienung der Pacer Pro entschieden – und bin damit jetzt restlos glcklich.

  30. KandiMcclung says:

     Germany

    Very good product essential and woth lots of usefull information about fisical condition and sleep. Disappointing the suggested workouts that sometimes look very repetitive and not really connected with your level

  31. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    This is an excellent watch, awesome quality as expected and works brilliantly, has a lot of features and works flawlessly

  32. SusannaKindel says:

     United Kingdom

    Excellent running watch, so much easier to charge than the M430 and the performance feedback is really informative

  33. Anonymous says:

     Germany

    Perfekte uhr fr mein Training. Schlafberwachungsfunktion ist super. Habe mehrere Uhren getestet. Das war die beste.

  34. VanessaKirtley says:

     Germany

    Die Uhr ist sowohl frs Laufen, Wandern als auch das Radfahren sehr gut geeigne

  35. Anonymous says:

     Italy

    Ero per anni utilizzatore di Garmin Vivoactive3, ma dopo il secondo orologio con batteria diffettosa dopo ca. 2 anni ho deciso di tornare da Polar (possedevo un favoloso RS800). Il Pacer lo utilizzo ormai da un mese e sono soddisfatto.
    GPS e misurazione cardiaca molto precisa. Misura i dati 24/24h e soprattutto la funzione Nightly Recharge fantastica. Anche Garmin ha la misurazione del sonno, ma Polar ti da anche una valutazione!
    La funzione FitSpark comoda e ti aiuta a diversificare ed arricchire il proprio allenamento con varie tipologie di esercizi aggiuntivi.
    Unica pecca in confronto al mondo Garmin che fino adesso ho riscontrato la composizione degli allenamenti (p.e. ripetute) che risulta su Polar Flow pi macchinosa e meno personalizzabile. La pace si pu indicare solo a zona mentre su Garmin si indica il range preciso di pace minima/massima per settore.
    Il Pacer lo utilizzo anche sulla bici abbinato ad un sensore di velocit bluetooth per gli allenamenti indoor.

  36. JoycelyThaxton says:

     Italy

    Golden Review Award: 21 From Our UsersL’orologio molto leggero (circa 40 gr), elegante (soprattutto rispetto alla concorrenza) e ben assemblato con materiali di qualit. Lo uso principalmente per correre ma un multi sport. Pur essendo considerato l’orologio medio di casa Polar ha praticamente tutte le funzioni dell'”ammiraglia” Vantage V2″ cui si differenzia per materiali e alcune funzioni di analisi in meno (test ortostatico, recovery pro e leg recovery la cui mancanza francamente la potete avvertire e siete un atleta amatore evoluto) e per alcuni quadranti utili nell’outdoor come alba/tramonto e visualizzazione altimetria. Per le capacit offerte l’orologio di casa Polar, e forse anche della concorrenza, con il miglio rapporto prezzo/qualit/funzionalit (io poi l’ho preso su Amzon Warehouse “come nuovo” oltretutto con ulteriore sconto del 20% ed stato un super affare).
    L’orologio dotato di altimetro barometrico (seppur non si pu come detto visualizzare un profilo altimetrico fuori dall’allenamento) che utilizza per il calcolo dell’altimetria in allenamento e della potenza (non necessita di alcun accessorio esterno come Garmin per calcolarla). Ha inoltre la navigazione (non cartografica per) con possibilit di importare percorsi e pianificarli in modo semplice con navigazione assistita trun-by-turn con Koomot. La navigazione se pur non cartografica funziona molto bene (meglio secondo me di quella equivalente di Garmin, per intenderci FR 255) unico l’limite non poter pianificare itinerari liberamente sulla piattaforma Polar come con Garmin. Molto ben fatta la parte analisi del sonno sia per dettagli che per precisione (superiore alla concorrenza). Il Polar nelle prima 4 ore di sonno profondo analizza la tua HRV e al mattino assegna un punteggio di recupero e prontezza all’esercizio (Nightly oecharge recovery) sulla base di questo indicatore e della qualit del sonno e propone sulla base del giudizio complessivo anche dei possibili allenamenti della giornata. Unico limite che vedo che ti dice se sei riposato e il tuo sistema centrale nervoso ha recuperato durante la notte fonda per non essendo come il test ortostatico una valutazione puntuale, fatta magari prima di allenarsi ad inizio giornata, in realt potresti aver recuperato nella seconda fase della notte e prime ore della mattina e quindi allenarti con meno prudenza di quella che potrebbe suggerirti. Diciamo che molto utili per capire se il tuo stile di vita generale o no sano (se bevo alcolici la notte prima, mangio tardi o se dormo meno l’orologio puntualmente mi da un punteggio basso di ricarica). Il monitoraggio della frequenza cardiaca H24/7 assorbe molta batteria ed in effetti se devo trovare un unico difetto che la ricarica non dura come dichiarato 7 giorni. Io con le notifiche del cellulare disattivate e anche la retroilluminazione automatica spenta e un allenamento giornaliero con GPS di circa un’ora lo devo ricaricare ogni 4/5 giorni. Il GPS, invece, assorbe veramente poca energia ed in effetti credo che le 35 ore dichiarate di funzionamento continuo in allenamento (mai provato :-)) siano realistiche .
    Lato sensore HR direi che funziona molto bene ma per chi si allena suggerisco sempre la fascia cardio e il GPS mi sembra buono, non al livello dei nuovi multibanda di casa Garmin o Coros ma francamente le differenze di rilevamento distanza che ho riscontrato sono minime. Diciamo che il mio vecchio Suunto con vecchio chip Siirf era velocissimo nell’aggancio (1 sec vs anche 10-15 di questo Polar) ed era un orologio di 6 anni fa, ma come sappiamo per ridurre i consumi le case sono passate poi a chip meno energivori ma forse anche meno precisi.
    La Piattaforma Polar Flow e la app sono ben fatte e danno molte informazioni. Si possono ovviamente pianificare gli allenamenti (anche ad intervalli o fasi), l’intera stagione ed possibile utilizzare uno dei programmi adattivi proposti da Polar per gare di 5k, 10k, 21K e maratona.

    Lo raccomando ai runners e anche perch no ai triatleti (essendo in effetti un orologio multisport) ed avendo anche la navigazione anche a chi fa del trail o trekking ma non impegnativo e non necessita delle mappe sull’orologio. Da quando l’ho preso non mi ha dato alcun problema in termini di bug o eventuali blocchi che hanno necessitato reset vari. Il fatto che uscito da 6 mesi e sia stato rilasciato da POlar un solo aggiornamento software la dice lunga sulla stabilit maturit del prodotto rispetto a concorrenti pi blasonati (nuovi Garmin da svariate centinai di euro dopo un anno dall’uscita presentano ancora molti bug) . Certamente vuol dire che non sono state aggiunte anche nuove funzionalit ma credo qualcosa arriver e ad ogni modo quello che fa pi che sufficiente. Purtroppo siamo abituati che ogni mese debba uscire un aggiornamento con nuove funzioni o metriche sportive ma molte volte sono specchietti per le allodole che servono a poco e con poche basi scientifiche dietro.
    Fa meno cose dei Garmin sicuramente (soprattutto lato smart) ma le fa bene e probabilmente sono quelle che servono per chi fa sport (molte metriche di Garmin francamente mi chiedo che utilit abbiano).

    NB: un orologio per chi fa sport non per chi vuole uno smartwatch, se lo comprate con questa idea rimarrete delusi e vi sembrer un orologio di almeno 5 anni fa (lo schermo non amoled, non ha funzionalit smart a parte le notifiche dl cellulare).

  37. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    This smart watch is amazing. You need to download the polar app to configure the watch so as to have access to your activities data.

    It is perfect for all purposes amd very accurate.

    Although i wish the screen is touch screen and colour but that’s not affecting the functionality of it though but if you don’t stay calm the operation can be complex at the beginning but that is why you have the manual which is very helpful.

    Nice and smart watch for all purposes.

  38. RosalinU67 says:

     Germany

    Die Pacer wurde als Ersatz fr meine M430 angeschafft und erfllt alle Wnsche fr den Durchschnittslufer. Einziger Unterschied zur Pacer Pro ist der fehlende Barometer (Hhe wird durch GPS ermittelt) und der Kompass, der fr Routenplanung genutzt werden kann. Aber ich denke 95% der Zielgruppe kann das verschmerzen. Akkulaufzeit und Ablesbarkeit sind aus meiner Sicht her top, ich kann diese Uhr jedem Hobbylufer empfehlen, fr Triathleten etc. gibts sicher besseres, aber da gibts andere Produkte von Polar.

  39. Anonymous says:

     Spai

    Golden Review Award: 41 From Our UsersBuen reloj. Buen software de Polar. En general estoy contento. Me tragu muchos vdeos sobre este reloj por parte de “influenzers”. Ahondaban en las cosas buenas, pero cuando he podido probar este reloj sobre el terreno he comprobado como se haban dejado cosas por explicar.
    Llevo 2 meses y unos 25 entrenos.

    Me arrepiento de la compra? En absoluto. Mejor reloj calidad precio.
    Lo volvera a comprar? Seguramente s, porque me niego a gastarme ms dinero y no me fo de las marcas baratas. Ya compr una y fue un desastre.
    Me parece un buen reloj? Para un pipiolo, imberbe y novato como yo, s. Para un atleta profesional o un amateur que necesita rendimiento, os ser muy til. Aunque creo que roza la chapuza en algunos puntos. Lo que sucede es que Polar tiene un modelo ms caro con casi las mismas prestaciones as que dudo que tengan planes para mejorar este modelo.

    Conclusin (por si no te apetece leer tanto): Ni es tan fiable como lo venden, ni todas las funciones de las que Polar alardea funcionan bien o estn bien pensadas. Al final, es un buen producto. Si te encaja en precio y los problemas que explico ms abajo no van a afectarte; se le saca muy buen rendimiento.

    Ahora te explico en ms detalle y justifico mis opiniones:

    Cosas que me gustan:
    – Facilidad para programar ejercicios personalizados
    – 4 datos en pantalla: bpm, tiempo, distancia etc. y configurables
    – Que no pite, sino que vibre. (aunque tambin es una maldicin, … lo explico)
    – La cantidad de datos que recoge, a m me ayudan a analizar mi progresin.

    Cosas mejorables.
    – Se confunde ms veces de las que debera, por el sudor o por el motivo que sea. En cada ejercicio al aire libre te pierde el GPS 4 o 5 veces y la media de tiempo se tiene que ir ajustando. A veces los latidos tambin los pierde y te dice que vas en zona 5 y t sabes que no, que ests en Zona 3 porque vas trotando. A los 20 segundos, se reajusta.
    Resulta muy molesto porque si ests en un ejercicio controlando pulsaciones, se vuelve loco vibrando. T sabes que ests haciendo el ejercicio bien, pero al reloj le da una pjara y no para de vibrar. Es muy molesto. No digo que los lap los calcule mal, sino que en tiempo real se pierde como cualquier reloj del montn; aunque este valga 300.

    – Seguimos con el tema de las vibraciones. A veces se solapan. El sistema vibra cada km para informarte del lap. Eso lo entiendo y creo que se puede quitar en la configuracin. De todas formas, este reloj est pensado para gente que hace ejercicio en serio. No puede ser que en medio de una serie te vibre para indicarte que ests en el lap del km4. Esto lo han probado profesionales? Y no les ha molestado, ni lo han detectado como un problema? Y si te pasa nadando o compitiendo? Que no es un reloj de 100 euros, por favor.

    – El tema del test de vo2 andando es completamente intil, porque nunca ests en rango. Te piden que vayas en zona 3 caminando durante 20 minutos en plano. Nadie con un poco de fondo fsico puede caminar en zona 3. Siempre ests en zona 2 o zona 3 muy baja. Adems, no hay llanos en las ciudades donde puedas hacer 20 minutos, ni en el campo. Olvidaros de ese test, porque no se puede hacer. Como nota aparte, s que tengo la sensacin que cuantos ms datos, el sistema te analiza y aprende de tus ejercicios. A m por ejemplo, los ejercicios similares cada vez me los punta ms bajo. En agosto eran 4/5 y en setiembre ya son 3/5 (moderados).

    Cosas Malas de este reloj.

    La visibilidad de la pantalla. Es demasiado oscura en todas las condiciones. Tengo mis dudas que Polar haya hecho pruebas en el terreno en este punto. Si miras los vdeos y la publicidad, todo es bonito. El reloj lleva un sistema que te permite ver en condiciones complejas como sol de medioda. En condiciones normales, TAMPOCO SE VE MUY BIEN, pero se ve.
    As que debo ser el nico ingenuo que entrena al alba o al ocaso. Porque NO SE VE NADA. Que no se vea a oscuras lo entiendo, pero en condiciones de luz suave se debera ver ALGO no? En el gimnasio en las zonas ms sombras, tampoco se ve bien . Os adjunto una foto para que veis que en luz suave, las letras grandes se ven ms o menos, pero las pequeas solo se intuyen.
    Esto implica que tienes que buscarte la pulsera y apretar el botn de luz cada vez que quieras ver tu ritmo cardaco o cunto tiempo te falta para terminar una serie, por ejemplo. Te dificulta los entrenos en condiciones de poca luz porque vas a ciegas. Aunque gires la mueca no ves nada. Tampoco te deja mantener la luz encendida durante todo el entreno. Sera una buena solucin para quienes entrenan de noche.
    Conclusin: me niego a creer que esto no lo hayan detectado los “influenzers”, ni el departamento de calidad de Polar. Para m es un fallo grave de diseo y su funcionalidad ms recomendada, me ha causado la mayor decepcin en el producto.
    Cada vez que en Agosto he ido a entrenar a las 6 y media de la maana, me lo ha dificultado. No se vea nada hasta las siete y media, cuando ya terminaba la sesin. Puede que estis pensando que no es preocupante para vosotros, pero si entrenis en invierno a las 8 de la maana o las 5 de la tarde, tendris el mismo problema.

    Nota a parte. Me he repasado la ayuda de la web buscando informacin sobre cmo mejorar este punto y no he encontrado nada al respecto.

    La correa sujeta bien, pero se nota muy endeble cada vez que te quitas o te pones el reloj para pasar los entrenos. Si entrenas 4 o 5 veces a la semana, la correa no va a durar los dos aos. Se nota en la calidad. La solucin hubiera sido poner un sistema wifi para pasar los entrenos sin tener que quitarte el reloj. Los 300 euros no dan para esa funcionalidad, parece ser.
    Yo a este reloj no le doy ms de dos aos. Se nota que no va a durar tanto. Se romper la correa y habr que decir si comprar una nueva o no, dependiendo del precio.

    El cargador no es USB estndar. En mi opinin, debera estar prohibido. Polar ha colocado un sistema propio y si pierdes el cable, tendrs un problema.

    Todos hablan de lo bueno, yo te explico también lo malo

  40. EuniceLillico says:

     Italy

    Ottimo prodotto, dopo averlo usato qualche volta ci fai subito la mano.

  41. Don Reisinger says:

     United States

    This watch works well. I just wish the numerals were a bit larger to ease viewing when on the run.

  42. Sean Hollister says:

     Italy

    Golden Review Award: 2 From Our UsersUn bel orologio da corsa, semplice e con la batteria eccellente.
    Luminosit durante la corsa, sotto il sole e con la retro illuminazione impostata a ON, funziona molto bene. Ottima possibilit di impostare gli allenamenti tramite PolarFlow oppure tramite applicazione Android.
    Purtroppo, qui arriviamo all’unico problema, ed molto irritante…sincronizzazione.
    Tramite Polar FlowSync non funziona proprio (HP Zbook con Windows 11), carica la batteria ma quando provo a far partire “SYNC”, succede niente. Con Android applicazione sincronizza da solo quando gli pare ma quando provo di sforzare il sync mi dice quasi sempre: “Il tuo sportwatch non stato sincronizzato” (Xiaomi A3 – Android One).
    Peccato, spero che qualche aggiornamento riuscir a risolvere questo problema.

    p.s. Quadranti modalit allenamento, bellissimi!

    Aggiornamento 05/09/2022
    Sono ormai quasi due mesi che su cellulare sincronizza senza problemi (su PC ancora non funzione bene ma qui probabilmente sia colpa di Windows 11).

  43. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    There are loads of smart watches on the market, most offer a whole range of features including keep fit trackers, heart monitors etc… as well as all the other things people want including integration with phones. But like many devices like that while they have plenty of features but are often master of none.

    This watch is a totally different proposition, on the surface you could be forgiven for thinking it is just “another” smart watch and indeed it can offer normal time functions etc… But that is about where the similarity ends.

    This watch has been designed specifically for serious health fans and features a ton of features specifically for those who run regularly, offering the ability to change all sorts of parameters around the workout you want to undertake. It will also allow you to analyse how you perform during the workout and even indicate what you might want to do to improve your performance, keeping a history of your workouts as well for historic comparisons etc… It will also give you a much enhanced breakdown of a run for example including timing, lap times, and virtually anything else a runner may want.

    However it is not limited to just running, it also has workout programs and functions for all major health activities. Additional enhancements over and above the average smart watch includes heart monitoring which is far more accurate than their peers and which offers more detailed information ensuring that your entire gym workout can be monitored, captured and analysed either on the watch itself or in the accompanying app (Polar Flow) which you can download, this syncs data from the watch which helps you analyse and create your personalised training plan.

    Other enhancements are a more precise GPS capability, route guidance like a satnav, ultra-light weight design, easy to operate buttons and a brighter display that is always on and is more easily visible in daylight. Basically the whole design has been geared to a runner or other fitness regimes to improve its usefulness and information delivery.

    However there are a few downsides to this watch, if you think this is a full blown smart watch as well as a fitness device. To start with the integration with a phone is limited to receiving notifications, but doesn’t give you the opportunity to respond to these notifications or take or make a call on the phone. So if you are used to using an existing smart watch as a hands free for example you will be disappointed. In a similar vein the battery life while impressive for the functions it provides for the athlete and having a constant display the quoted ‘up to 35 hours training (100 hours on power save mode)’ between charges will not impress you when you can get a week or two out of many smart watches these days.

    Another thing to be aware of is that you should forget touch screen functionality, this watch doesn’t have it, the only control you have is through the buttons built into the casing, similar to what you used to get on the old casio digital watches etc… Of course to a runner who is timing their workout or wanting to analyse their performance none of this really matters. But if you really want a fully featured smart watch that you can use while exercising you may be better off looking elsewhere.

    If however you are a keen runner or similar then this watch is probably perfect for you, it is simple to use, light and comfortable to wear, has a display that works better outdoors than indoors not to mention better than most normal smart watches. Finally it feels that it will be robust and withstand the odd knock or whatever with no issues, something I wouldn’t be so confident about with some smart watches with their large touch screens!

  44. Anonymous says:

     United Kingdom

    This Polar Pacer GPS running watch with high speed processor works excellent with no any errors. Very lightweight (40g) only, has ergonomic design with super-grip buttons. Has hyperfast processor, always-on MIP color display, accurate GPS and long-life battery. What he has: pace, time, distance, stopwatch, lap timer and Interval timer. Polar precision prime optical heart rate tracking technology. Music controls, push notifications and compatible with 3rd party apps (Strava, Adidas Runastic, Nike Run Club and others). If you will get serious, having a suite of powerful training features at your disposal will help you run towards your goals like: FitSpark daily training guidance, FuelWise smart fuel reminder and energy sources, polar running program and training load pro. I have to admit that this watch is my favorite one now. I’m wearing every day and doesn’t even take it off her hand. This is great value for money (169,50) at the moment. Good quality watch, that’s why I can easily recommend it to anyone.

  45. ShaylaKpnqyhqcn says:

     United Kingdom

    I got offered this for free under the Amazon vine program.

    I have had smart bands, watches and everything else over the years. I started with a jawbone, that was one of the first sports bands and had terrible reliability. Moved onto various fitbits and mibands and then onto a fossil hybrid watch.

    Currently I have a mobvoi ticwatch pro 3, which has been on my wrist for 20 months.

    The issue with wear os watches are pretty clear to see, still waiting for wear os3 to land, less than stella battery life (although the twp3 last 3 days due to its cleaver dual screen tech) and lack of useful app integration. Also when tracking an all day hike or similar it’s alway touch and go how long the watch will last when using GPS etc.

    So I’ve been considering a 2nd watch for sport and training tracking so was happy to receive the pace to try.

    This review is more a series of observations, to be honest, and I hope it’s useful.

    First up its not a smart watch, You can literally do nothing when you get notifications so I’ve turned that feature off, the lack of a touch screen is also weird in 2022 but once you get used to the 5 button setup it works ok.

    Secondly, the display…. this is dull inside and compared to the oled panels on my other watches is really poor, but I guess that’s the price of decent battery life in a very light package. BUT outside, wow, the display is great and can be read in direct sunlight without any issues at all. So where it matters the display is fine.

    Another “issue” is the screen size , the bezels round the screen are rather large so the screen itself is only 1.2 inches across, but again for the limited use, that’s not a real problem either.

    The weight is a serious plus, You won’t know you’re wearing it and I on the 2 nights I’ve worn it in bed it’s tracked my sleep automatically and accurately. I didn’t notice the watch at all.

    The mobile app is simple and although a little dated in looks tracks and syncs with the watch well and without issues . It’s easy to link to Google fit and Strava and the data uploads to both instabtly.

    So overall as a sports tracker it’s very very good. And I’ve found that I’m wearing it 24 hours a day (over a weekend) but will revert to my smart watch for work on Monday. I’ll definitely be wearing this at night though and whenever I do sport or training and probably when I’m away from home for a few days, as the battery life is so much better than my normal watch and that’s one less thing to worry about. I intend to use this for swimming as well, I don’t trust my other watxlch to get wet and survive.

    So overall if you understand the limitations I think this is an excellent watch and does what it sets out to do.

    I think it should maybe cost less than the 169 that’s it’s currently for sale at ,but it’s not excessively expensive and again, if you just want a running or training watch, then this will do the job , and do it well.

    The box comes with a 2nd strap, well half of one, for smaller wrists and the straps are easy to replace with quick release tabs.

    So not a premium watch but one that feels well made and should take quite a lot of abuse over the coming months, and one I’m glad to have to to be using.

    Probably, for me, a perfect companion watch to my regular wear os one.

    A sports watch, not a smart watch.

  46. LovieHelton says:

     United Kingdom

    Shockingly lightweight and packed with features. Looks good and the great size. Not overly big. Has all the essentials plus some.

    Great piece of tech and reasonably priced

  47. OnaBurnside says:

     Italy

    Inquadriamo bene il target di utenti: trattasi di un orologio per RUNNERS, molti dei programmi e funzioni sono adatte esclusivamente per chi corre.

    Ha il GPS, programmi per recupero, allenamento, riabilitazione.

    I materiali sono sono il massimo, completamente in plastica, ma appunto il focus la corsa, senza fronzoli, il modello pro pi rifinito (ma costa 100 euro in pi).

    Le funzioni sportive vanno molto bene, ma appunto solo quelle. Non ha il touchscreen (e ci pu stare, visto che con le mani sudate o bagnate in piscina sarebbe difficile da utilizzare).

    Un punto di grande debolezza la luminosit: veramente bassa, sotto il sole si fatica a vedere il display, anche regola sola al massimo.

    La risoluzione non alta e i men sono intuitivi ma scarni.

    Insomma, un vero e proprio orologio da corsa, da indossare nel momento in cui si corre o si va in palestra e da togliere a fine allenamento. Non permette di chiamare, dovete comunque portare il telefono con voi per sentire la musica (pu solamente skippare le tracce sul telefono).

    Lo consiglio a chi vuole un orologio sportivo duro e puro, chi invece cerca uno smartwatch anche da indossare nel tempo libero mi orienterei su altro.

    Ci siamo quasi, ma…

  48. JoanneMoon says:

     United Kingdom

    Golden Review Award: 7 From Our UsersI got a Pacer Pro to replace my Grit X, because the Grit X is quite a lump and frankly not comfortable at all on my small wrists. The Pacer Pro is soooo light and comfortable in comparison, and the only real difference is the lack of a touchscreen, which is no loss at all TBH. This is my 5th Polar in my lifetime and this is easily the best. Some reviewers have complained about the screen clarity but think it just fine (certainly better than the Grit X screen). The battery life excellent. After receiving it I fully charged it, and then after 10 days, 6.5 hours GPS, nightly sleep monitoring (not 24 heart rate), it had only used 80%. Not bad 🙂 My only small gripe is that it doesn’t have an audiable ‘beep’: It only vibrates for notifications.

    Obviously as always with Polar, remember that is doesn’t do classic smart watch features like contactless payments and onboard music file storage, but if you want those then get a Garmin and have fun paying for multitude of features that to don’t need, won’t use, or are downright pointless. If you simply want an excellent running/multisport watch then you can’t go wrong with a Pacer Pro

  49. Anonymous says:

     Italy

    Correre con questo sportwatch bellissimo, ora posso davvero capire in ogni momento come mi sto allenando e che risultati ho ottenuto, tutto in modo semplice e chiaro. Il display si vede benissimo anche mentre corro. La batteria dura tantissimo e la ricarica molto veloce. Ho provato anche il walking test: eccezionale!

  50. LenoreNordstrom says:

     Spai

    Golden Review Award: 2 From Our UsersMe ha sorprendido la ligereza y el diseo estilizado del reloj, que hacen que apenas lo notes cuando lo llevas puesto. Es ideal para salir a correr e incluso otros deportes, ya que su manejo es muy sencillo y cuenta con todas las funciones necesarias para un montn de deportes.
    La luminosidad de la pantalla es muy buena y la duracin de la batera es excelente.
    Tambin quiero destacar que los leds de registro de la frecuencia cardaca son altamente precisos, incluso comparando con banda en el pecho.
    En definitiva, un reloj ideal y creo que a un precio muy contenido.

  51. VirgilHuggard says:

     United Kingdom

    My wife and I are both sporty people and we’ve stuck with Garmin smartwatches for years now, so we’re very used to the Garmin “Connect” app and user interface. It was always going to be a bit of a culture shock to switch to a different system, but Polar has a great reputation for sports technology and we were keen to give it a try and compare with Garmin.

    Overall, this is a great device which offers some unique and valuable features, particularly in the app, which are advantageous compared to Garmin’s current offering. For example, one app feature my wife really loves as a keen runner is Polar’s interactive route map which allows you to scroll through a time bar and see your detailed stats (such as heart rate and pace) at any point in time during the run.

    Here’s a summary of the key points and some minor niggles worth knowing about:

    – Two strap size options mean it’s great for smaller wrists. You do have to wear it quite tight to ensure the sensor can take accurate readings (it needs to sit flush against the skin and not move when exercising) but you can wear it more loosely for day-to-day wear. It’s a very lightweight watch though and doesn’t feel bulky or heavy on the wrist. It’s also very understated so doesn’t look out of place on the wrist or obviously like it’s a sports watch.
    – The screen is exceptionally clear and well laid out. During a run or bike ride, it’s really easy to glance down and see all of the information you want in one place rather than having to scroll through the display options mid-activity.
    – If you’re used to wearing a Garmin, it can take a little while to get used to the ordering of the Polar buttons – it feels a little unintuitive to press what feels like a “back” button to get to the activity options but you get used to it after a while.
    – The built-in GPS tracking works really well – we’ve had no issues with it finding or losing a signal, and it seems really accurate when compared to other trackers and online mapping tools. The Strava integration works seamlessly with no issues.
    – The battery life is really impressive. We’ve put it through it’s paces, logging activities every day and often with GPS tracking on, and have only charged it twice since the first start-up charge.
    – The only oddity/frustrations that we’ve had are with the pause function. During a run, my wife passed a friend’s house and paused her run as she chatted for maybe 10 minutes or so. When she went to restart the watch, the first part of the run was gone. We’ve been unable to find out from the user manual if there is a time limit for pausing. Additionally, she paused an activity after completing it, and when she went to save the activity by pressing and holding the same bottom left button, a notification on the watch came through at the same time and the watch crashed/restarted and lost the activity.

    Overall then, this is a very decent smartwatch but it’s not perfect. I’d give it 4.5 stars if I could, but I’ve rounded it up to 5 stars here because 4 stars feels too stingy given the only minor issues I’ve found with it.

  52. CharmaiURR says:

     United Kingdom

    The Polar Pacer Pro is a good looking watch designed for runners, while being nice and lightweight at just 41g. Unlike the Polar Vantage V2 which is made of aluminium, the main body of the Pacer Pro is plastic, but the bezel is made of aluminium. It still looks fantastic while being considerably cheaper than the Vantage.
    As it has a waterproof rating of fifty metres, it can also be used when swimming or in the rain.
    You get two different size straps with it for big and small wrists, they are made of silicone and feel very comfortable with the breathable holes throughout. Straps are replaceable, and if you wish to use a standard 20mm strap you can do so by using the shift adapter that comes with the watch.
    The watch does not have a touch screen and is controlled only by five buttons, two on the left and three on the right, the buttons have a nice feel to them with a ridged texture for a good grip. While scrolling through menus etc, the watch is fast and responsive to button presses.
    It has a 1.2-inch always on display made of gorilla glass, which is large and readable in sunlight. While the display does not stand out like a Samsung Galaxy watch 4, it is made to be functional and readable in any light condition.
    The sensor is loaded with LED lights for highly accurate heart rate monitoring. Another nice feature is the flatness of the sensor, which does not have a bump.
    The battery should last you around seven days if you use it as a standard smartwatch, you will get around 35 hours using GPS or if you are happy to get less accurate GPS tracking, you can use power save mode and get around 100 hours.
    When using it as a smartwatch, you will get notifications that you can see but you can not reply to them, there is also no sound, just vibration only. You do get a nice weather widget along with music controls for your phone, such as play, pause skip etc.
    You get to track your steps, activity levels, calories burned, even how much you have run up or down hill, thanks to the barometer and hill splitter feature, along with nightly recharge which shows your advanced sleep tracking, recovery etc.
    It can also collect running power data, which monitors the effort you made throughout your run, so you can change your intensity.
    There are various widgets, like one that will suggest workouts based on your current fitness, along with one that suggests when you should drink or eat on long activities.
    It offers over 100 activity trackers, ranging from running and cycling to ballet and everything in between. You can customise them in the Polar flow app on your phone.
    It not only allows you to run various fitness tests, but it also lets you know how you are doing with your training, such as whether you are training too much or too little.
    It also works with the Polar running program, in which you get to set a goal such as a 5k and it will give you a training plan based on your current fitness level.
    I have pretty much glossed over what this watch can do but long story short, if you are into sports/fitness then you need this watch, it is fantastic. If you just want to see how many steps you have taken for the day then avoid this like the plague and get an Apple watch or Galaxy Watch, you will get to choose lots of pretty watch faces, contactless payments and store your music on the watch without the need for a phone etc, although at these prices you would expect you could do that with this watch as well.

    Awesome running smart watch